This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0076
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-76/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.
Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.
Case T-76/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.
Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.
Case T-76/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:16