Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TA0357

    Case T-357/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal — Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    OJ C 311, 16.8.2022, p. 11–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.8.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 311/11


    Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Jose A. Alfonso Arpon v EUIPO — Puma (PLUMAflex by Roal)

    (Case T-357/21) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal - Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2022/C 311/15)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL (Arnedo, Spain) (represented by: C. Hernández, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

    Re:

    By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 April 2021 (Case R 2991/2019-1).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.


    Top