This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0293
Case T-293/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark UM — Genuine use of the mark — Use with the consent of the proprietor — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark — Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
Case T-293/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark UM — Genuine use of the mark — Use with the consent of the proprietor — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark — Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
Case T-293/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark UM — Genuine use of the mark — Use with the consent of the proprietor — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark — Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
OJ C 294, 1.8.2022, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 294/28 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Muschaweck v EUIPO — Conze (UM)
(Case T-293/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark UM - Genuine use of the mark - Use with the consent of the proprietor - Use in the form in which the mark was registered - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Representation by the proprietor of the trade mark - Evidence of use submitted within the time limit set)
(2022/C 294/40)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ulrike Muschaweck (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Konle, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Joachim Conze (Munich) (represented by: H. Bolte, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2021 (Case R 2260/2019-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Ms Muschaweck and Mr Conze.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Ulrike Muschaweck to pay the costs. |