Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0414

    Case C-414/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 7 July 2021 — VP Capital NV v Belgische Staat; other parties: PricewaterhouseCoopers Belastingadviseurs NV, Ernst & Young Tax Consultants BV, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BV

    OJ C 368, 13.9.2021, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.9.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 368/11


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 7 July 2021 — VP Capital NV v Belgische Staat; other parties: PricewaterhouseCoopers Belastingadviseurs NV, Ernst & Young Tax Consultants BV, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BV

    (Case C-414/21)

    (2021/C 368/10)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Hof van Cassatie

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: VP Capital NV

    Respondent: Belgische Staat

    Other parties: PricewaterhouseCoopers Belastingadviseurs NV, Ernst & Young Tax Consultants BV, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BV

    Question referred

    Does freedom of establishment, as guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU, preclude national legislation, such as that at issue here, where it results in a Luxembourg company which records write-downs on shares in Luxembourg and which, although deducting those write-downs in principle from its taxable income, cannot actually deduct them from its taxable income because of the existence of a tax loss position, being taxed on the write-back of those write-downs in Belgium following the transfer of its registered office to Belgium, unless the increases in value masked by that write-back are allocated to a liability account not available for distribution, whereas a Belgian company which has recorded write-downs on shares in Belgium is not taxed on the write-back of those write-downs, provided that the write-downs had not been previously deducted from its Belgian taxable income, without needing to allocate the increases in value masked by that write-back to a liability account not available for distribution?


    Top