Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0215

    Case C-215/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) lodged on 6 April 2021 — Zulima v Servicios prescriptor y medios de pagos E.F.C. S.A.U.

    OJ C 320, 9.8.2021, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.8.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 320/13


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) lodged on 6 April 2021 — Zulima v Servicios prescriptor y medios de pagos E.F.C.  S.A.U.

    (Case C-215/21)

    (2021/C 320/16)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Referring court

    Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Zulima

    Defendant: Servicios prescriptor y medios de pagos E.F.C. S.A.U.

    Question referred

    Where a consumer raises a complaint against an unfair term under Directive 93/13/EC (1) and an out-of-court offer to settle is made, Article 22 of the Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Law of Civil Procedure) has the effect of compelling the consumer to bear the costs of the proceedings without regard to the seller’s or supplier’s prior conduct in having failed to heed the letters of formal notice [issued to him]. Do those Spanish rules of procedure constitute a significant obstacle capable of dissuading a consumer from exercising the right to effective judicial review of the potentially unfair nature of a contractual term contrary to the principle of effectiveness and Article[s] 6(1) and 7(1) of Directive 93/13?


    (1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).


    Top