This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CB0113
Case C-113/21 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria — Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
Case C-113/21 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria — Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
Case C-113/21 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria — Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 15, 16.1.2023, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 15/19 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union
(Case C-113/21 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic - Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria - Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
(2023/C 15/19)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Parties
Appellant: Maen Haikal (represented by: S. Koev, advokat)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Karaleev and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Mr Maen Haikal shall pay, in addition to his own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |