This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0086
Case T-86/20: Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (SCIO)
Case T-86/20: Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (SCIO)
Case T-86/20: Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (SCIO)
OJ C 114, 6.4.2020, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.4.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 114/16 |
Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (SCIO)
(Case T-86/20)
(2020/C 114/17)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mandelay Kft. (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SCIO — European Union trade mark No 11 191 194
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 in Case R 1312/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
alter the contested decision in a way to annul the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution; |
|
— |
as an alternative, annul both the contested decision and the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of essential procedural requirements. |