This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0754
Case T-754/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Cristescu v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Acts contrary to the dignity of the office — Preliminary assessment — Administrative investigation — Mandate entrusted to IDOC — Data protection — Principe of impartiality — Principe of sound administration — Disciplinary procedure — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary penalty of reprimand — Procedural irregularity — Reasonable time — Extenuating circumstances)
Case T-754/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Cristescu v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Acts contrary to the dignity of the office — Preliminary assessment — Administrative investigation — Mandate entrusted to IDOC — Data protection — Principe of impartiality — Principe of sound administration — Disciplinary procedure — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary penalty of reprimand — Procedural irregularity — Reasonable time — Extenuating circumstances)
Case T-754/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Cristescu v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Acts contrary to the dignity of the office — Preliminary assessment — Administrative investigation — Mandate entrusted to IDOC — Data protection — Principe of impartiality — Principe of sound administration — Disciplinary procedure — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary penalty of reprimand — Procedural irregularity — Reasonable time — Extenuating circumstances)
OJ C 284, 25.7.2022, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.7.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 284/29 |
Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Cristescu v Commission
(Case T-754/20) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Acts contrary to the dignity of the office - Preliminary assessment - Administrative investigation - Mandate entrusted to IDOC - Data protection - Principe of impartiality - Principe of sound administration - Disciplinary procedure - Rights of the defence - Disciplinary penalty of reprimand - Procedural irregularity - Reasonable time - Extenuating circumstances)
(2022/C 284/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Adrian Sorin Cristescu (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 27 February 2020 by which it imposed on him the disciplinary penalty of reprimand pursuant to Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 27 February 2020 which imposed a reprimand on Mr Adrian Sorin Cristescu; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |