This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0441
Case T-441/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission (Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty) (Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-300/16 — Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive countervailing duty — Legal basis — Non-retroactivity — Legal certainty — Article 266 TFEU — Proportionality — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 103 of the Union Customs Code — Registration Regulation — Plea of illegality — Admissibility)
Case T-441/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission (Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty) (Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-300/16 — Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive countervailing duty — Legal basis — Non-retroactivity — Legal certainty — Article 266 TFEU — Proportionality — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 103 of the Union Customs Code — Registration Regulation — Plea of illegality — Admissibility)
Case T-441/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission (Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty) (Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-300/16 — Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive countervailing duty — Legal basis — Non-retroactivity — Legal certainty — Article 266 TFEU — Proportionality — Right to effective judicial protection — Article 103 of the Union Customs Code — Registration Regulation — Plea of illegality — Admissibility)
OJ C 294, 1.8.2022, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 294/25 |
Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission (Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty)
(Case T-441/20) (1)
(Subsidies - Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India - Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T-300/16 - Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty - Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive countervailing duty - Legal basis - Non-retroactivity - Legal certainty - Article 266 TFEU - Proportionality - Right to effective judicial protection - Article 103 of the Union Customs Code - Registration Regulation - Plea of illegality - Admissibility)
(2022/C 294/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India), Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
Re:
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/526 of 15 April 2020 re-imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India as regards Jindal Saw Limited, following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-300/16 (OJ 2020 L 118, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA to pay the costs. |