This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0380
Case T-380/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Tubes Radiatori v EUIPO — Antrax It (Radiator) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing a radiator — Earlier designs — Grounds for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Freedom of the designer — No scope for innovation — Overall impression)
Case T-380/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Tubes Radiatori v EUIPO — Antrax It (Radiator) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing a radiator — Earlier designs — Grounds for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Freedom of the designer — No scope for innovation — Overall impression)
Case T-380/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Tubes Radiatori v EUIPO — Antrax It (Radiator) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing a radiator — Earlier designs — Grounds for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Freedom of the designer — No scope for innovation — Overall impression)
OJ C 294, 1.8.2022, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 294/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Tubes Radiatori v EUIPO — Antrax It (Radiator)
(Case T-380/20) (1)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Community design representing a radiator - Earlier designs - Grounds for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Freedom of the designer - No scope for innovation - Overall impression)
(2022/C 294/33)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro, M. Balestriero and P. Menapace, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Antrax It Srl (Resana) (represented by: L. Gazzola and G. Lugato, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2020 (Case R 1275/2017-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Antrax It and Tubes Radiatori.
Operative part of the judgment
The General Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Tubes Radiatori Srl to pay the costs. |