This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0089
Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)
Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)
Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)
OJ C, C/2024/4718, 5.8.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4718/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/4718 |
5.8.2024 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission
(Case T-89/20) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Refusal of the request - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary sanction - Removal from post - Withdrawal of removal from post - New disciplinary procedure - New removal from post - Unjustified absences - Conflict of interests - Impartiality - Material and non-material damage)
(C/2024/4718)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PV (represented by: D. Birkenmaier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of (i) the decision of 12 December 2019 by which the appointing authority refused his request for assistance D/456/19, (ii) the decision of 21 October 2019 to remove him from post, (iii) 11 decisions regarding his unjustified absences and the decision rejecting complaint R/519/19, and (iv) the letter of 21 September 2016 regarding the amount he owed as a result of his unauthorised absences and the decision rejecting complaint R/537/19 and, second, compensation for the damage purportedly suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Declares that each party is to bear its own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4718/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)