EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CB0574
Case C-574/20, Finanzamt Österreich: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security — Family benefits — Indexation based on price — Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings — Question manifestly inadmissible)
Case C-574/20, Finanzamt Österreich: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security — Family benefits — Indexation based on price — Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings — Question manifestly inadmissible)
Case C-574/20, Finanzamt Österreich: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security — Family benefits — Indexation based on price — Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings — Question manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 164, 8.5.2023, p. 20–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 164/20 |
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel
(Case C-574/20, (1) Finanzamt Österreich)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security - Family benefits - Indexation based on price - Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law - No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings - Question manifestly inadmissible)
(2023/C 164/25)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesfinanzgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: XO
Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Examination of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, in the light of Article 45 TFEU. |
|
2. |
The second question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria) is manifestly inadmissible. |