Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62019TN0320

Case T-320/19: Action brought on 27 May 2019 — BV v Commission

OJ C 246, 22.7.2019, p. 37–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.7.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/37

Action brought on 27 May 2019 — BV v Commission

(Case T-320/19)

(2019/C 246/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BV (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the decision of 17 September 2018 by which the interest generated on the capital representing his transferred pension rights was not returned to him;

—

in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging the lack of a legal basis and of reasoning of the contested decision.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 7(6) of the general provisions for the implementation of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations adopted by the Commission.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging unjust enrichment in favour of the Union caused by the allocation to the budget of the European Union of the amount deducted in respect of the capital appreciation.
Top