EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TN0209
Case T-209/19: Action brought on 5 April 2019 — Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
Case T-209/19: Action brought on 5 April 2019 — Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
Case T-209/19: Action brought on 5 April 2019 — Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
OJ C 182, 27.5.2019, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.5.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 182/38 |
Action brought on 5 April 2019 — Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
(Case T-209/19)
(2019/C 182/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: J. Rether and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc. (Hollywood, Florida, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in colours black and white — Application for registration No 15 910 301
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 578/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |