EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TJ0371
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 July 2020.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK – Earlier European Union figurative mark SAVE THE DUCK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods or services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 July 2020.
Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK – Earlier European Union figurative mark SAVE THE DUCK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods or services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-371/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 July 2020.
Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK – Earlier European Union figurative mark SAVE THE DUCK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods or services – Similarity of the signs – Global assessment of likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-371/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:339