This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0307
Case T-307/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — SQlab v EUIPO (Innerbarend) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Innerbarend — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-307/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — SQlab v EUIPO (Innerbarend) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Innerbarend — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-307/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — SQlab v EUIPO (Innerbarend) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Innerbarend — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 201, 15.6.2020, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.6.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 201/23 |
Order of the General Court of 2 April 2020 — SQlab v EUIPO (Innerbarend)
(Case T-307/19) (1)
(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Innerbarend - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 201/33)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: SQlab GmbH (Taufkirchen, Germany) (represented by: A. Koelle, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2019 (Case R 2180/2018-4) relating to an application for registration of the word sign Innerbarend as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
SQlab GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |