This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0506
Case T-506/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Workplace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis Holding (UMA WORKSPACE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier UK figurative and word marks WORKSPACE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-506/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Workplace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis Holding (UMA WORKSPACE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier UK figurative and word marks WORKSPACE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-506/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Workplace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis Holding (UMA WORKSPACE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier UK figurative and word marks WORKSPACE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 230, 13.7.2020, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 230/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — Workplace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis Holding (UMA WORKSPACE)
(Case T-506/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark UMA WORKSPACE - Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier UK figurative and word marks WORKSPACE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 230/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Workplace Group plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Hine, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Technopolis Holding Oyj (Oulu, Finland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2019 (Case R 1910/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Workspace Group and Technopolis Holding.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Workspace Group plc to pay the costs. |