This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TJ0312
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Dentsply De Trey GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark AQUAPRINT — Earlier national word marks AQUACEM and national unregistered marks AQUACEM and AQUASIL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action for passing off — No misrepresentation.#Case T-312/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.
Dentsply De Trey GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark AQUAPRINT — Earlier national word marks AQUACEM and national unregistered marks AQUACEM and AQUASIL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action for passing off — No misrepresentation.
Case T-312/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 May 2019.
Dentsply De Trey GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark AQUAPRINT — Earlier national word marks AQUACEM and national unregistered marks AQUACEM and AQUASIL — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action for passing off — No misrepresentation.
Case T-312/18.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:358