EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TB0258
Case T-258/18: Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Brunke v Commission (Action for failure to act — Deadline for bringing an action — Starting point — No invitation to act — Second invitation to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Application of a declaratory nature — Application for interim measures — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Case T-258/18: Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Brunke v Commission (Action for failure to act — Deadline for bringing an action — Starting point — No invitation to act — Second invitation to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Application of a declaratory nature — Application for interim measures — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
Case T-258/18: Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Brunke v Commission (Action for failure to act — Deadline for bringing an action — Starting point — No invitation to act — Second invitation to act — Manifest inadmissibility — Application of a declaratory nature — Application for interim measures — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
OJ C 131, 8.4.2019, p. 50–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.4.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 131/50 |
Order of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — Brunke v Commission
(Case T-258/18) (1)
(Action for failure to act - Deadline for bringing an action - Starting point - No invitation to act - Second invitation to act - Manifest inadmissibility - Application of a declaratory nature - Application for interim measures - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(2019/C 131/58)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lothar Brunke (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Schniebel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)
Re:
Principally, an application for a declaration establishing ‘the discriminatory effect’ of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22) and, in the alternative, first, an application, in essence, for an interim measure to be directed against the Commission and, secondly, an application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to follow up on the applicant’s letters of 6 June and 27 December 2017.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed in part due to the Court’s manifest lack of jurisdiction to hear the action and in part because it is manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no longer any need to rule on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. |
|
3. |
Mr Lothar Brunke shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
|
4. |
The Council shall bear its own costs relating to its application to intervene. |
|
5. |
The Parliament shall bear its own costs relating to its application to intervene. |