This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0848
Case T-848/16: Action brought on 1 December 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)
Case T-848/16: Action brought on 1 December 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)
Case T-848/16: Action brought on 1 December 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)
OJ C 38, 6.2.2017, p. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.2.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/41 |
Action brought on 1 December 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)
(Case T-848/16)
(2017/C 038/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vans, Inc. (Cypress, California, United States of America)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (representation ‘V’) — Application No 10 345 403
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2016 in Case R 2129/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 151(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 19(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95; |
|
— |
Infringement of Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) and (3) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95; |
|
— |
Infringement of the principles of legal security, of sound administration, of equal treatment and of non-retroactivity. |