EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0226
Case T-226/16: Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)
Case T-226/16: Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)
Case T-226/16: Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)
OJ C 232, 27.6.2016, p. 35–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/35 |
Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Ipuri v EUIPO — van Graaf (IPURI)
(Case T-226/16)
(2016/C 232/46)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ipuri GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: van Graaf GmbH & Co. KG (Vienna, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘IPURI’ — Application for registration No 8 971 021
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 March 2016 in Case R 886/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs before the Board of Appeal. |
Pleas in law
— |
Infringement of Article 15 in conjunction with Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009, Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
— |
Infringement of Article 8(2)(a) when applying Article 42(3) of Regulation No 207/2009. |