EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0166
Case T-166/16: Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
Case T-166/16: Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
Case T-166/16: Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
OJ C 200, 6.6.2016, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 200/32 |
Action brought on 13 April 2016 — Panzeri v Parliament
(Case T-166/16)
(2016/C 200/45)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Pier Antonio Panzeri (Calusco d’Adda, Italy) (represented by: C. Cerami, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
uphold the present action and, accordingly, annul the contested measures as unlawful; |
|
— |
consequently, order the European Parliament to repay EUR 12 000, together with interest and adjustment for inflation, or the higher sum which will be paid in compliance with the contested order in the course of the present proceedings; |
|
— |
order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present action is brought against Memorandum No D 302 681 of 11 February 2016 of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, which contains the statement of reasons for Debit Note No 2016-207 of the same date appended thereto and concerning the recovery of sums alleged to have been unduly paid by way of parliamentary assistance allowances.
The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-677/15, Panzeri v Parliament and Commission (OJ 2016 C 27, p. 74).