This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0057
Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
Case T-57/16: Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
OJ C 118, 4.4.2016, p. 35–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.4.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/35 |
Action brought on 8 February 2016 — Chanel v EUIPO — Li Jing Zhou and Golden Rose 999 (Representation of an ornament)
(Case T-57/16)
(2016/C 118/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Chanel SAS (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Li Jing Zhou (Fuenlabrada, Spain) and Golden Rose 999 Srl (Rome, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design representation of an ornament — Community Design No 1 689 027-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2015 in Case R 2346/2014-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
declare the contested design invalid; |
|
— |
order EUIPO, and any other parties or interveners liable to appear in the present proceedings in support of the contested decision, to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation No 6/2002. |