Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0346

    Case T-346/16: Order of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex — Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark — No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 269, 14.8.2017, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.8.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 269/21


    Order of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex)

    (Case T-346/16) (1)

    ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex - Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

    (2017/C 269/30)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: CSL Behring AG (Berne, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vivatrex GmbH (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: F. Stangl, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1263/2015-4 and R 1221/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CSL Behring and Vivatrex.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

    2.

    Each party is to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.


    Top