This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0659
Case T-659/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Second Display) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Second Display — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-659/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Second Display) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Second Display — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-659/16: Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Second Display) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Second Display — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 249, 31.7.2017, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 249/28 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 June 2017 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Second Display)
(Case T-659/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Second Display - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptiveness - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 249/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO dated 10 June 2016 (Case R 106/2016-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Second Display as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders LG Electronics, Inc. to pay the costs. |