Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CN0247

    Case C-247/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 29 April 2016 — Heike Schottelius v Falk Seifert

    OJ C 279, 1.8.2016, p. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 279/14


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 29 April 2016 — Heike Schottelius v Falk Seifert

    (Case C-247/16)

    (2016/C 279/19)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Landgericht Hannover

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Heike Schottelius

    Defendant: Falk Seifert

    Question referred

    Can a principle of EU consumer law be derived from the second indent of Article 3[(5)] of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (1) to the effect that for all transactions in respect of consumer goods between non-consumers and consumers it is sufficient, in order to claim secondary rights under a warranty, that the non-consumer with warranty obligations has not completed the remedy within a reasonable time, and there is no requirement in that respect that a period of time for removing the defect be fixed expressly, and that the relevant provisions of national law, for instance also in the case of a contract for work on consumer goods, should be interpreted accordingly and if necessary applied restrictively?


    (1)  OJ L 171, 7.7.1999, p. 12.


    Top