This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0747
Case T-747/15: Action brought on 22 December 2015 — EDF v Commission
Case T-747/15: Action brought on 22 December 2015 — EDF v Commission
Case T-747/15: Action brought on 22 December 2015 — EDF v Commission
OJ C 78, 29.2.2016, p. 24–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 78/24 |
Action brought on 22 December 2015 — EDF v Commission
(Case T-747/15)
(2016/C 078/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Électricité de France (EDF) (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Debroux, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
principally, annul Articles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the contested decision for infringement of essential procedural requirements, errors of law and errors of fact; |
— |
in the alternative, annul Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the contested decision, in that the amount that EDF was required to reimburse was very significantly overestimated, and |
— |
in any event, order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies, principally, on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea, alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU. |
2. |
Second plea, alleging infringement of Article 107 TFEU. That plea is composed of two branches:
|
3. |
Third plea, alleging a failure to state reasons for the contested decision. |
In support of the action, the applicant also raises two pleas in law in the alternative.
1. |
First plea raised in the alternative, alleging that recovery of the majority of the aid is time barred. That plea in divided into two branches:
|
2. |
Second plea raised in the alternative, alleging errors of calculation committed by the Commission in determining the alleged aid. That plea in divided into three branches:
|