This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0529
Case T-529/15: Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (START UP INITIATIVE)
Case T-529/15: Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (START UP INITIATIVE)
Case T-529/15: Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (START UP INITIATIVE)
OJ C 371, 9.11.2015, p. 37–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/37 |
Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (START UP INITIATIVE)
(Case T-529/15)
(2015/C 371/38)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin (TO), Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Braga, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘START UP INITIATIVE’ — Application for registration No 13 011 838
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2015 in Case R 2777/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |