This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0524
Case T-524/15: Action brought on 7 September 2015 — NICO/Council
Case T-524/15: Action brought on 7 September 2015 — NICO/Council
Case T-524/15: Action brought on 7 September 2015 — NICO/Council
OJ C 371, 9.11.2015, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/34 |
Action brought on 7 September 2015 — NICO/Council
(Case T-524/15)
(2015/C 371/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl (Pully, Suisse) (represented by: J. Grayston, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, and D. Rovetta, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
order the Council, under measures of organization of the procedure, to disclose the full version of Annex 1 to document 7228/14 EXT 1 of 23 January 2015 concerning ‘I/A ITEM NOTE’ from the General Secretariat of the Council to the Permanent Representative Committee as well as any other document concerning the applicant, |
— |
annul the decision of the Council contained in the letter of 26 June 2015, addressed to the applicant’s lawyers, concerning review of the list of designated persons and entities in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as amended by Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012, and in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012, in so far as the contested decision constitutes a refusal to remove the applicant from the list of persons and entities made subject to the restrictive measures, |
— |
order the Council to bear the costs of the proceedings |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a violation of the rights of defence and right to be heard, a breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and a breach of the principle of sound administration
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging an insufficient statement of reasons
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and a breach of essential procedural and substantive requirements
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging a breach of essential procedural and substantive requirements, a breach of article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and a lack of competence of the person signing the challenged decision.
|
(1) Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39).
(2) Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).