This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0325
Case T-325/15: Action brought on 22 June 2015 — Sun System Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató v OHIM — Hollandimpex Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (Choco Love)
Case T-325/15: Action brought on 22 June 2015 — Sun System Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató v OHIM — Hollandimpex Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (Choco Love)
Case T-325/15: Action brought on 22 June 2015 — Sun System Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató v OHIM — Hollandimpex Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (Choco Love)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.8.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 279/41 |
Action brought on 22 June 2015 — Sun System Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató v OHIM — Hollandimpex Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató (Choco Love)
(Case T-325/15)
(2015/C 279/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Sun System Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hollandimpex Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató kft (Budapest, Hungary)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Choco love’ — Community trade mark application No 11 496 916
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2015 in Case R 1369/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
uphold the application, alter the contested decision by accepting the opposition and reject the Community trade mark application ‘Choco love’; or in the alternative: |
|
— |
annul the contested decision and remit the case to OHIM for reexamination; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the applicant’s costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |