Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TN0281

    Case T-281/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyres for vehicle wheels, pneumatic)

    OJ C 270, 17.8.2015, p. 32–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20150731059617102015/C 270/402812015TC27020150817EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20150526323322

    Case T-281/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyres for vehicle wheels, pneumatic)

    Top

    C2702015EN3220120150526EN0040322332

    Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyres for vehicle wheels, pneumatic)

    (Case T-281/15)

    2015/C 270/40Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Fucci, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Design at issue: Community design (Tyres for vehicle wheels, pneumatic) — Community design No 4 700-0001

    Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2015 in Case R 1287/2014-3

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    grant the application for restitutio in integrum made by Pirelli Tyre SpA in accordance with Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs, by declaring that the payment of the renewal fee relating to the second five-year period by way of a withdrawal from current account No 000069 under the name of Bugnion SpA is lawful and that, therefore, the right to the design at issue is still valid;

    order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Pirelli Tyre SpA in the present proceedings.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs.

    Top