This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0280
Case T-280/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads)
Case T-280/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads)
Case T-280/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads)
OJ C 270, 17.8.2015, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-280/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads)
Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads)
(Case T-280/15)
2015/C 270/39Language of the case: ItalianParties
Applicant: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Fucci, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Design at issue: Community design (Tyre treads) — Community design No 4 692-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 January 2015 in Case R 1286/2014-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
grant the application for restitutio in integrum made by Pirelli Tyre SpA in accordance with Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs, by declaring that the payment of the renewal fee relating to the second five-year period by way of a withdrawal from current account No 000069 under the name of Bugnion SpA is lawful and that, therefore, the right to the design at issue is still valid; |
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Pirelli Tyre SpA in the present proceedings. |
Plea in law
— |
Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs. |