This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TJ0509
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 February 2017.#Kessel medintim GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Premeno — Earlier national word mark Pramino — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-509/15.
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 February 2017.
Kessel medintim GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Premeno — Earlier national word mark Pramino — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-509/15.
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 February 2017.
Kessel medintim GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Premeno — Earlier national word mark Pramino — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-509/15.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2017:60