This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0033
Case T-33/15: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (BIMBO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark BIMBO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-33/15: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (BIMBO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark BIMBO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-33/15: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (BIMBO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark BIMBO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 156, 2.5.2016, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
2.5.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 156/38 |
Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (BIMBO)
(Case T-33/15) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark BIMBO - Absolute grounds for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 156/50)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico City, Mexico) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2014 (Case R 251/2014-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign BIMBO as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV to pay the costs. |