Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0652

Case C-652/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße

OJ C 118, 4.4.2016, p. 2–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.4.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/2


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße

(Case C-652/15)

(2016/C 118/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir

Defendant: Kreis Bergstraße

Questions referred

1.

Does the aim of efficient management of migration flows constitute an overriding reason in the public interest capable of denying exemption for a Turkish national born in federal territory from the requirement for a residence permit which he could claim by virtue of the standstill clause of Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC/Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association?

2.

If the Court of Justice of the European Union answers the above question in the affirmative: What are the qualitative requirements for the existence of an ‘overriding reason in the public interest’ in relation to the aim of efficient management of migration flows?


Top