This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0365
Case C-365/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 July 2015 — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
Case C-365/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 July 2015 — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
Case C-365/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 July 2015 — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
OJ C 328, 5.10.2015, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.10.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 328/5 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 14 July 2015 — Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
(Case C-365/15)
(2015/C 328/04)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Düsseldorf
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
Question referred
Is Article 241 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the national law referred to therein must, having regard to the general EU-law principle of effectiveness, provide for the payment of interest on reimbursed import duties from the time of payment of those duties up to the time of their reimbursement, even in cases in which the right to reimbursement has not been the subject of a claim before a national court?