Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0845

    Case T-845/14: Action brought on 24 December 2014  — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort)

    OJ C 89, 16.3.2015, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.3.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 89/32


    Action brought on 24 December 2014 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort)

    (Case T-845/14)

    (2015/C 089/38)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: August Brötje GmbH (Rastede, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘HydroComfort’ — Application No 12 233 763

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 1302/2014-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    Infringement of 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    Infringement of 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top