EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0767

Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014  — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)

OJ C 46, 9.2.2015, p. 53–54 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.2.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/53


Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)

(Case T-767/14)

(2015/C 046/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV (Uden, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Jonker, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Artevos GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt eV (Bielefeld, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before the CPVO

Applicant for Community plant variety right: applicant

Community plant variety right at issue: Oksana — application No 2005/1046

Contested decision: decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 2 July 2014 in Case A 007/2013

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

consequently, uphold the applicant’s appeal against decisions R 1232, OBJ 13-086, OBJ 13-087, OBJ 13-088 and OBJ 13-090 of the CPVO, find that the applicant’s variety is (sufficiently) new within the meaning of Article 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 and grant a Community plant variety right for the applicant’s variety;

order the CPVO and the other parties to pay the costs.

Plea in law

infringement of Articles 10 and 76 of Regulation No 2100/94.


Top