This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0018
Case T-18/14: Action brought on 6 January 2014 — Aguas de Valencia v Commission
Case T-18/14: Action brought on 6 January 2014 — Aguas de Valencia v Commission
Case T-18/14: Action brought on 6 January 2014 — Aguas de Valencia v Commission
OJ C 61, 1.3.2014, p. 18–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.3.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 61/18 |
Action brought on 6 January 2014 — Aguas de Valencia v Commission
(Case T-18/14)
2014/C 61/33
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Aguas de Valencia, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
|
— |
in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
|
— |
in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
|
— |
annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.