Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0402

    Case T-402/14: Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — FCC Aqualia v OHIM — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (AQUALOGY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark AQUALOGY — Earlier Community word mark AQUALIA and earlier national figurative mark aqualia — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

    OJ C 118, 4.4.2016, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.4.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 118/25


    Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2016 — FCC Aqualia v OHIM — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (AQUALOGY)

    (Case T-402/14) (1)

    ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark AQUALOGY - Earlier Community word mark AQUALIA and earlier national figurative mark aqualia - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

    (2016/C 118/27)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: FCC Aqualia, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda de Sousa, N. González-Alberto Rodríguez and C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Grau Mora, C. Viola Zendrera and A. Torrente Tomás, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2014 (Case R 1209/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, SA and FCC Aqualia, SA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders FCC Aqualia to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.


    Top