This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014FB0073
Case F-73/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 September 2015 — Kriscak v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Staff Regulations of Europol — Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol — List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention — Restricted posts — Europol Decision — Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision — Application of the CEOS to Europol staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract — Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration — Action for annulment — Action for compensation)
Case F-73/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 September 2015 — Kriscak v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Staff Regulations of Europol — Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol — List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention — Restricted posts — Europol Decision — Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision — Application of the CEOS to Europol staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract — Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration — Action for annulment — Action for compensation)
Case F-73/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 September 2015 — Kriscak v Europol (Civil Service — Europol staff — Europol Convention — Staff Regulations of Europol — Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol — List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention — Restricted posts — Europol Decision — Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision — Application of the CEOS to Europol staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract — Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration — Action for annulment — Action for compensation)
OJ C 371, 9.11.2015, p. 46–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/46 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 September 2015 — Kriscak v Europol
(Case F-73/14) (1)
((Civil Service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Staff Regulations of Europol - Annex 1 to the Staff Regulations of Europol - List of the posts given in bold characters which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Europol Convention - Restricted posts - Europol Decision - Posts which may be occupied only by a person recruited from a competent authority within the meaning of Article 3 of the Europol Decision - Application of the CEOS to Europol staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term temporary contract - Refusal to grant a temporary contract of undetermined duration - Action for annulment - Action for compensation))
(2015/C 371/48)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Christiana Kriscak (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann, J. Arnould and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract and for compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and shall pay one third of the costs incurred by Ms Kriscak. |
|
3. |
Ms Kriscak shall bear two thirds of her own costs. |
(1) OJ C 380, 27.10.2014, p. 27.