This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0596
Case T-596/13: Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)
Case T-596/13: Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)
Case T-596/13: Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)
OJ C 39, 8.2.2014, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.2.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 39/21 |
Action brought on 15 November 2013 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael)
(Case T-596/13)
2014/C 39/37
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Emsibeth SpA (Verona, Italy) (represented by: A. Arpaia, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims the General Court should:
|
— |
set aside the contested decision; and |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community mark sought: the figurative mark ‘Nael’, for goods in class 3 — application for registration No 9726894
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Peek & Cloppenburg KG
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘Mc Neal’, for goods in class 3
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and rejection of the application for registration of the mark
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/09.