EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0318

Case T-318/13: Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)

OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 6–6 (HR)

3.8.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/25


Action brought on 13 June 2013 — Vita Phone v OHIM (LIFEDATA)

(Case T-318/13)

(2013/C 226/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Vita Phone GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by P. Ruess and A. Doepner-Thiele, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2013 in Case R 1072/2012-1;

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘LIFEDATA’ for goods and services in Classes 10 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 10 525 053

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009


Top