EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TB0722
Case T-722/13: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV) (Community trade mark — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-722/13: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV) (Community trade mark — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-722/13: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV) (Community trade mark — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.10.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 361/8 |
Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)
(Case T-722/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 361/09
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bolloré (Ergué Gabéric, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2013 (Case R 1960/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bolloré and The Directv Group, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the defendant and the intervener. |