EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0648
Case T-648/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — IOIP Holdings v OHIM (GLISTEN) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark GLISTEN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-648/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — IOIP Holdings v OHIM (GLISTEN) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark GLISTEN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-648/13: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — IOIP Holdings v OHIM (GLISTEN) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark GLISTEN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 96, 23.3.2015, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 96/18 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — IOIP Holdings v OHIM (GLISTEN)
(Case T-648/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GLISTEN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 096/22)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: IOIP Holdings LLC (Fort Wayne, United States) (represented by: H. Dhondt and S. Kinart, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 1028/2013-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign GLISTEN as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders IOIP Holdings LLC to pay the costs. |