Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013FN0050

    Case F-50/13: Action brought on 22 May 2013 — ZZ v Commission

    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 63–64 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 16–16 (HR)

    20.7.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 207/63


    Action brought on 22 May 2013 — ZZ v Commission

    (Case F-50/13)

    2013/C 207/112

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: ZZ (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of the Commission’s decision on the claim for further compensation, made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations, in order to obtain full compensation for the material and non-material damage that he suffered as a result of his occupational disease and the multiple irregularities in the processing of his claim under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations.

    Form of order sought

    Annul the Commission’s decision of 7 August 2012 on the claim for further compensation under ordinary law and the relevant articles of the Staff Regulations, made by the applicant on 18 April 2012 on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations;

    Annul the Commission’s decision of 14 February 2013 rejecting the applicant’s complaint made on 25 October 2012 on the basis of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

    Grant the applicant the sum of EUR 1 798 650 by way of compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered as a result of the occupational disease and payable under the ordinary law principle of full compensation, after deduction of the compensation granted under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations, possibly revised by the Tribunal in the context of the ongoing Case F-142/12;

    Grant the applicant the sum of EUR 145 850 in respect of the non-material damage resulting from misconduct of the Commission with regard to the applicant;

    Grant the applicant reimbursement of the legal costs and other expenses incurred, and interest on late payments and all other interest payments that the Court deems just and proper, running from December 2004, when the damage suffered by the applicant could have been calculated and made good;

    Order the Commission to pay the costs.


    Top