EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0456
Case C-456/13 P: Appeal brought on 09/08/2013 by T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2013 in Case T-279/11: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission
Case C-456/13 P: Appeal brought on 09/08/2013 by T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2013 in Case T-279/11: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission
Case C-456/13 P: Appeal brought on 09/08/2013 by T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2013 in Case T-279/11: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission
OJ C 325, 9.11.2013, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 325, 9.11.2013, p. 15–15
(HR)
|
9.11.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 325/16 |
Appeal brought on 09/08/2013 by T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2013 in Case T-279/11: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission
(Case C-456/13 P)
2013/C 325/27
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, avocat, D. Slater, Solicitor)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Council of the European Union, French Republic
Form of order sought
The appellants claim that the Court should:
|
— |
declare the present appeal admissible and well founded; |
|
— |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2013 in Case T-279/11 (‘the Contested Judgment’) to the extent it dismisses as inadmissible the Appellants' action for annulment and rejects its related pleas of illegality; |
|
— |
refer the case back to the General Court for examination of the substance; |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay all costs and expenses before the Court of Justice. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Appellants put forward the following grounds in support of their Appeal:
|
1. |
the GC committed an error of law in concluding that the Contested Regulations entailed implementing measures within the meaning of Article 263(4) TFEU; |
|
2. |
the GC committed an error of law in concluding that Regulation 393/2011 (1) was not of individual concern to the Appellants; |
|
3. |
the GC committed an en-or of law in rejecting the plea of illegality, as a result of errors (1) and (2) above. |
As a result, the Appellants request your Court (i) to set aside the Contested Judgment to the extent that it declares inadmissible the Application for Annulment and rejects the plea of illegality; and (ii) refer the case back to the GC.
(1) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2011 of 19 April 2011 fixing the allocation coefficient for the issuing of import licences applied for from 1 to 7 April 2011 for sugar products under certain tariff quotas and suspending submission of applications for such licences
OJ L 104, p. 39