This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0361
Case T-361/12: Action brought on 6 August 2012 — Premiere Polish v OHIM — Donau Kanol (ECOFORCE)
Case T-361/12: Action brought on 6 August 2012 — Premiere Polish v OHIM — Donau Kanol (ECOFORCE)
Case T-361/12: Action brought on 6 August 2012 — Premiere Polish v OHIM — Donau Kanol (ECOFORCE)
OJ C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 11–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.10.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 319/11 |
Action brought on 6 August 2012 — Premiere Polish v OHIM — Donau Kanol (ECOFORCE)
(Case T-361/12)
2012/C 319/21
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Premiere Polish Co., Ltd (Cheltenham, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Jones and M. Carter, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Donau Kanol GmbH & Co KG (Ried im Traunkreis, Austria)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 June 2012 in case R 851/2011-4; |
|
— |
Allow the applicant’s Community trade mark application No 8777005 in its entirety or in the alternative, the proceedings be remitted to the Board of Appeal; and |
|
— |
Order the Office to pay the applicant’s costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ECOFORCE’ for goods in class 3 — Community trade mark application No 8777005
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 7243173 of the figurative mark ‘ECO FORTE’ for goods in classes 1, 3 and 5
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.