Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TA0292

    Case T-292/12 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2016 — Mega Brands v EUIPO — Diset (MAGNEXT) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark MAGNEXT — Earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 251, 11.7.2016, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.7.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 251/21


    Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2016 — Mega Brands v EUIPO — Diset (MAGNEXT)

    (Case T-292/12 RENV) (1)

    ((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union word mark MAGNEXT - Earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    (2016/C 251/21)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Mega Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented initially by V. Melgar and subsequently by H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Diset, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2012 (Case R 1722/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Diset and Mega Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2012 (Case R 1722/2011-4);

    2.

    Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mega Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug.


    (1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.


    Top