Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012FN0053

    Case F-53/12: Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ and Others v European Economic and Social Committee

    OJ C 200, 7.7.2012, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.7.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 200/22

    Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ and Others v European Economic and Social Committee

    (Case F-53/12)

    2012/C 200/46

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Partial annulment of the decision of the European Economic and Social Committee to promote the applicants from grade AST 5 to grade AST 6, in the part fixing the multiplication factor.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 of the Deputy Secretary General, General Affairs, Human Resources and Internal Affairs, in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion to grade AST 6/1 with effect from 1 April 2011 established by those decisions is the one that had been fixed for them on 1 April 2009 and not the one fixed for them on 24 March 2011 with effect from 1 April 2011;

    —

    In the alternative, annul those decisions in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion does not take account of their seniority in step acquired between 1 April 2009 and 1 April 2011;

    —

    In the alternative, annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 in so far as they enter into effect as from 1 April 2011 and not on the date immediately following that on which the decisions of 24 March 2011 entered into effect;

    —

    Order the EESC to pay the costs.
    Top